Megaupload Case Not a Slam Dunk, Judge Says

The judge said a discussion about wiping Megaupload's database could be premature

Megaupload founder Kim Dotcom may not be going to trial after all on charges of copyright infringement.

That's according to the judge in the case, and the development comes after months of drama involving the now shuttered filing-sharing website.

U.S. District Judge Liam O'Grady made the proclamation while hearing arguments about deleting Megaupload member files, which are enormously expensive to maintain.

The judge said a discussion about wiping Megaupload's database could be premature and that a more relevant question was why Megaupload had not been formally served with criminal papers by the United States.

Attorneys on both sides weighed in.

Dotcom's attorney, Ira Rothken, maintained that whereas individuals can be served outside of U.S. jurisdiction, foreign companies cannot, reports TorrentFreak.

"My understanding as to why they haven't done that is because they can't. We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States," he said, according to the NZ Herald.

Prosecutor Jay Prabhu alluded to Dotcom as an individual who owned 68 percent of the now shuttered company.

This isn't the first time problems with paperwork have thrown a wrench into proceedings against Dotcom. A month ago, New Zealand authorities admitted they made a procedural mistake before seizing Kim Dotcom's computers, documents and a trove of vehicles back in January.

Considering the visibility of the case, the incredible amount of resources that have been involved in arresting Dotcom and taking his possessions, as well as the millions of files kidnapped from users -- many of whom were using Megaupload for legitimate purposes -- you'd think the question about whether or not a trial against Dotcom is possible would have come up sooner.

Dotcom himself is furious that his businesses have been destroyed and says the case is the result of "corruption on the highest political level, serving the interests of the copyright extremists in Hollywood," reports TorrentFreak.

"We have already been served a death sentence without trial and even if we are found 'not guilty,' which we will, the damage can never be repaired," he said.

Keep up with the latest tech news, reviews and previews by subscribing to the Good Gear Guide newsletter.

Christina DesMarais

PC World (US online)

1 Comment

Anonymous

1

The copyright issue is a smokescreen, and the demands by prosecuters in the US to destroy the very files that are the 'evidence' required for the case highlights this. So what was it really all about? Is it really about keeping the lid on International War Crimes committed by US govt officials? Encrypted files enormously embarrassing to corrupt criminals in the US govt are supplied to Wikileaks via megaupload. It is the civic responsibility of every human on earth to prevent such war crimes by targeting the individual criminal decision makers and those subordinate to them who implement those crimes! Why are such evil scum protected by the 'cloak and dagger of national security? Because the whole system has become subverted and this is what social justice movements like wikileaks, occupy, anonymous etc seek to remedy.

Comments are now closed.

Latest News Articles

Most Popular Articles

Follow Us

Resources

Don’t have an account? Sign up here

Don't have an account? Sign up now

Forgot password?